Choosing the Right Tools and Technology for Athletic Performance

In the evolving world of sports performance, the pendulum has swung significantly towards the use of metrics and technology. While these advancements are exciting, they should not replace foundational knowledge in physiology, psychology, biomechanics, sport competency, and program design. The key is to integrate technology in a way that complements these core principles. Effective communication of metrics can be more impactful than the technology itself, emphasizing the importance of feelings, trust, and understanding over mere figures and gadgets.

The Importance of Feelings Over Figures

The world of sports performance relies heavily on trust and relationships. You can have all the fancy technology, but if you can’t explain its importance and how it drives results, it’s not much use. The perception of the technology’s value often matters more than the technology itself. As twentieth-century entrepreneur Roger Babson noted about the 1929 stock market crash, people sometimes mistakenly believe that the world is ruled by figures rather than feelings. This holds true in sports performance: trust and clear communication are paramount.

Acquiring Technology: Validity and Reliability

Before investing in new technology, ask these two critical questions:

  1. Is it valid?
  2. Is it reliable?

Validity is the degree to which a tool measures what it claims to measure. There are various types of validity, but for most coaches, face validity—whether the measure looks valid to both trained and untrained observers—will suffice.

Reliability refers to the consistency of the measurement. When reviewing literature, look for studies that address both relative reliability (the consistency of an individual’s performance over time) and absolute reliability (the variability in repeated measurements).

The 3 P’s: Problem, Process, and Presentation

Once you’ve ensured the validity and reliability of a tool, it’s time to consider the 3 P’s: Problem, Process, and Presentation. This framework helps integrate technology effectively into your coaching practice.

  1. Problem: Identify the specific issue or area of performance you aim to improve. Understanding the problem allows you to select the right tool for the job.
  2. Process: Develop a clear process for how you will use the technology to address the problem. This includes data collection methods, frequency of measurements, and integration into training programs.
  3. Presentation: Communicate the data and its implications effectively to athletes, coaches, and other stakeholders. Use clear visuals and straightforward language to ensure everyone understands the importance and impact of the metrics.

Practical Application

Consider these steps when selecting and implementing new technology:

  • Identify the Problem: What specific performance issue are you addressing? This could range from improving sprint speed to enhancing recovery times.
  • Establish the Process: Determine how the technology will be integrated into daily training. Set up regular check-ins to monitor progress and make adjustments as needed.
  • Effective Presentation: Use dashboards and visual tools like box plots to present the data. Ensure the visuals are easy to understand and highlight key trends and insights.

Conclusion

Incorporating technology into sports performance is not about replacing foundational knowledge but enhancing it. By focusing on the 3 P’s—Problem, Process, and Presentation—you can ensure that technology serves as a valuable tool in your coaching arsenal. Remember, the goal is to build trust and understanding, making complex data accessible and actionable for your athletes.

By prioritizing feelings over figures and effectively communicating the value of your tools, you’ll foster a more supportive and effective training environment. This approach will help your athletes not only understand the importance of the data but also see its impact on their performance and growth.